Cause no harm: in games, the responsibility is with the researcher
This post is going to speak primarily to researchers who work with games.
Before research is ever conducted, there’s a lot of planning. If the chosen plan calls for the use of human beings, then university research generally has to get the approval of an institutional review board (IRB), or human subjects committee. These guys are trained to make sure that researchers don’t cause harm.
In a nutshell, very few people really understand games, be they these IRB committees, regular folks, professors or researchers. That’s why, in my experience of games research, the researcher is the one responsible for the safety of the people involved. Researchers are also accountable for the research that they publish. I’ll admit that I’ve made mistakes in my research. What’s important with a new area, like games, is that we take a critical eye, and separate the wheat (the useful and representative data) from the chaff (the unrepresentative and potentially harmful data). I want to talk about wheat and chaff in published research as well as the process of conducting research.
Neils Clark :: Feb.07.2007 :: Game Addiction, Research :: No Comments »

